Talk:History of Katapesh
Naming conventions
Our naming conventions discourage the use of subarticles for general use, saving this feature for use in categories. If you think we should revisit this, we can certainly open discussion about it again. -- yoda8myhead 01:57, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
- Do you mean to name this "Catapesh/History" differently ? Ok. Just propose me a name. --Dmeta 23:17, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
- Current naming convention policy discourages use of subarticles. A subarticle is one which simply adds a slash and then a descriptor after the name of an existing article. Doing so does add an automatic return header to the main article (which I like) but the whole syntax seems unencyclopedic to me and looks funny (which I don't like). I made the comment above simply to denote that the article name was against existing convention, though I have opened a discussion here on whether the policy should be changed. -- yoda8myhead 04:42, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
- Aaa.. Now I understand what is the topic. :) I am afraid I cannot help you a lot in the article/subarticle discussion. I don't have the experience of how the things could be messed up later in a wiki projects. For now, in order to maintain the current consistency of namings, I could change it to "History of Katapesh". --Dmeta 08:40, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
- Current naming convention policy discourages use of subarticles. A subarticle is one which simply adds a slash and then a descriptor after the name of an existing article. Doing so does add an automatic return header to the main article (which I like) but the whole syntax seems unencyclopedic to me and looks funny (which I don't like). I made the comment above simply to denote that the article name was against existing convention, though I have opened a discussion here on whether the policy should be changed. -- yoda8myhead 04:42, 10 July 2009 (UTC)